Obama Jihad Denver Billboard ROCKS!

     I called Mr. Wolf (Nov.23, 2009) to discuss his billboard. Mr. Wolf has been harassed (called a "racist") by several people who have taken exception to his billboard, and he's been praised by the vast majority of people who have expressed feelings about his sign. The ground on which we ended up standing firm and in total agreement was this: How can somebody actually defend Obama when he can't defend himself? Obama could have gone to court and slammed the door on the argument but passed on it. Obama's silence and secrecy is an outrage, and it is an insult to public service.
     Mr. Wolf knows current events and politics and is straight on Obama and showed to me utterly NO indication that race has anything to do with anything which inspired his billboard. While I've never been "behind" the birth certificate drive or inquiry I see it as a valid challenge until a document more credible than a made to order certificate is produced and verified as authentic. What are people who are learned in the law saying about the evidence? Aren't those licensed lawyers bringing those suits over the birth certificate? Yes. Who is anyone to object unless they can claim knowledge and expertise in kind? Nobody.
     We also touched on the apparent incompatibility of some Muslims with the mainstream American base values; Judeo Christian values.

      When seeking to relocate to America it's simply necessary to accept certain compromises to a religion which can apparently dictate or dominate one's behavior on a moment to moment basis, and which includes in some populations or groups the emersion of young children in lengthy recitals and readings of religious verses which can contain a doctrine of belief against "infidels" founded upon outright debasement of their souls, their beliefs, and their morals. With the exception of perhaps the Amish, American children and teens have much more freedom to choose and much less intimidation and indoctrination relating to religion, and teachings they receive are seemingly more forgiving than those received through Muslim schooling.
     A common bond for all Americans comes from teaching American first, religion second. Patriotism takes second place to some religious teachings, and widely reported is the fact that Islam is in fact the opposite of it. When you teach Muslim first, where is the fabric that holds America together as a free country where anyone can choose their own religion or to have none? The idea of freedom always has to come first; American first. Islam doesn't provide for this when children are schooled the way they are in too many Muslim households. The things that make America great are for everyone who lives here, but we see, in public, nobody is forced to honor the religion of anyone else, or to accommodate the habits or rituals associated with them. Conservatism and moderation is the best you can get here. Go with the flow or go back home; Christmas is in order. Holding on to customs and religious rituals or teachings which are imposing or radically different from that of decent Americans is an afront to our freedoms we shouldn't have to tolerate.
     Concerning Obama, I indeed feel that his documentation (birth cert./citizenship controversy) is highly suspect. However, I personally favor pursuing indictments for crimes already proven, the proof of which is literally all over the internet. Ineligibility causes vacation of office while proof of crime equates to prison for many more than just Obama. I can picture David Plouffe (campaign mgr.) saying to Obama:

     Take the gov't back from SEIU and from GE? Did those corporations already own America before the election? Obama and whom taking gov't back from whom? What the hell was Obama talking about? His speech, this sort of speech, was not about anything at all. It was filler to make the cardboard cup cake taste like actual food. I don't say lies, lies, lies, I say fraud by wire, radio or television to benefit a financial institution. What were donations solicited for if not for exactly what we can see Obama doing? Did he lie to get monetary contributions so as to later be in a position to rescue the banks with payoffs of any number of sorts? Did the Obama stimulus $$$ benefit a financial institution when Bernanke sent $.5T to foreign national banks? Could Obama have done this without saying whatever Americans wanted to hear so as to generate revenue for his campaign?
     To lie to get a vote is an act wholly and entirely separate from lying to get money; one's vote and one's money are two different property rights. Have you noticed that nobody in news goes beyond the term "corruption"? Corruption happens to be a pattern of criminal acts, and criminal acts are acts which offend or violate criminal statutes, and criminal statutes are laws, but this is never mentioned because nobody in the news knows anything about law. A.Napolitano does well, but you'll be hard pressed to find a bona fide scholar of law featured among guests or commentators.
     Practice of law is not knowledge of the law; it is separate. One's license to practice law doesn't persuade me when I've made a fool of a state attorney general in five of six cases, I've written more than 130 proposed statutes, and when you with your license and law degree, and your accountant, don't even know anything about Tax Code § 83. You've got to be kidding. Apply it to your paycheck and get back to me, dummy. Can Congress really prohibit me from contracting outside of my state for insurance? Can you hear me? I'm just not impressed.
     If I lie to get money through the internet by email solicitations, web sites, blogs, slobbering hoards blind to country and law, if I did that to you am I guilty of fraud?

If you cough up the cash for that am I going to be indicted??? I should hope so. How is Obama's relationship with donors different than this? I've never seen myself farther from gov't than I do today, while as early as 1993 I was exclaiming, "How do you people tolerate these public servants?" While through legal aid as advocacy I've pursued the justice I was always promised, all I've seen is a growing expanse between Americans and the laws they paid to have written and enacted. With all of that thrown into hyper drive by Obama all I can conclude is that taking gov't back, as a campaign platform, is outright fraud as it relates to donations; nothing to do with votes or campaign lies to get them. If were a donor to the Obama campaign I'd be filing criminal complaints with the Judge Advocate General of the U.S. Navy.

It slaps me in the face, this first step into criminal statutes to look for Obama and his friends, our new owners. Also, this does not hang on any no fly zone for campaign promises simply because all candidates lie some. The money is to drive the campaign, the campaign is to defraud voters out of their vote, and these are two distinct activities; the money is not directly to get the vote. Considering how opposed to what was promised America has received in Obama I would have to charge that his campaign platform was outright fraud for the fact that he never intended at all to fulfill what he promised, taking gov't back, etc. The closer to and more acquainted with Obama one gets, the closer to lies and the further from mere broken campaign promises Obama and his stated platform gets, so keep watching. Is that fraud in relation to the votes as well? And if you're Obama's mega-rich (over $200k) you can probably hear (Nov. '09) the call for an Afg. war tax to fund the military there.

This is the least of it. Political prisoners, anyone? Obama and the DOJ deny nothing. A declaration of Obama's ineligibility to hold office is nothing compared to thirty years in prison for him and a dozen or so conspirators. C'mon?